There are many who would acknowledge that there is a point - some point - where the faith of Americans in our public institutions began to wane. I would offer that it is right here. From the start, Americans could see right through the smokescreen presented to explain the assassination of an American President in 1963.
gas·light
[ˈɡasˌlīt]
verb
gaslighting (present participle)
manipulate (someone) using psychological methods into questioning their own sanity, memory, or powers of reasoning:
"in the first episode, Karen Valentine is being gaslighted by her husband" · "we are being gaslit about our health on a grand scale by these people"
The Zapbruder film
The American people have watched the film above thousands of times. The audience wanted to believe that the institutions put in place to serve and protect us were telling us the truth, and so we watched.
The quality of the film is not that great but by about 16 seconds, it is clear that something is desperately wrong. The President is clutching his throat, and we can see that he has been hit. The authorities tell us that that throat shot came from behind, from the 6th floor of the schoolbook depository. We have no evidence to dispute this conclusion, so we are more than willing to accept what is presented to us.
The Head shot
The American people were jolted by the assassination of an American President. They were further jolted watching the murder of Lee Harvey Oswald on live television. Now came the linchpin. As Americans watched this film, when it became public some 7 years later, they had their first real and obvious brush with gaslighting from their own government as official after official told them, straight faces intact, that the shot they see at about :21 was also from the back.
This lie insulted the intelligence of anyone watching the film.
From his prison cell, mobster James Files admitted to firing the fatal head shot. He told us that shot was fired from the so-called grassy knoll that was to the front and right of the limousine. The only thing we did not already know here was the name of the shooter. We knew he was there, and we knew he fired that fatal shot and 60 years of manipulation couldn't make us unsee it and unknow it.
We had long rejected the single gunman, magic bullet, nonsense our government was trying to feed us. Anyone who had seriously investigated the matter, could see that this was a professional hit, bought and paid for, signed, sealed and delivered.
I was just a boy when I first heard the story of my namesake
I was born in September of 1964 and named John Fitzgerald, in honor of the slain President. In my formative years, I vividly remember being exposed to the music of my older brothers Fred and Mike. CCR, Steppenwolf, and The Byrds were 3 prominent ones. My brother Fred played me one of the most beautiful songs I ever heard with such a gorgeous harmony it gave me chills. He asked me to listen and tell him who the song was about.
I felt chills as those harmonies went right through me...
He - was in Dallas town,
He - was in Dallas town,
From a 6th floor window, a gunner shot him down,
He - died in Dallas town.
That song came out about '65 or so. The lie created by our government had already been inculcated into our culture and here I was, a boy of maybe 9 years old being fed the story line through a song so hauntingly beautiful I could not stop listening to it. To this day, I still love the song, which is now also a reminder of a brother my family lost in 2015, and I still grieve the loss of a Catholic President slain before I was ever born.
I do not think for one second that he was killed by a lone gunman from a 6th floor window.
Why does it matter? The larger lie.
On the streets of Deally plaza, many witnesses claimed there was a 2nd gunman in the grassy knoll. The authorities quickly dismissed the testimony and deliberately laid out the one-gunman narrative.
Why?
James Files stated that the first person he met when he arrived in Dallas was Jack Ruby. Yes, that Jack Ruby.
If there are 2 shooters, there is a conspiracy. If there is one shooter, the whole thing goes away with the death of that one shooter.
Or so they thought. To the American people, it all just looked dirtier and dirtier. It is obvious that Oswald is led into an ambush. It is obvious that something very deep and sinister has happened here. Why does it matter? Here is why. The same government that told us that the Kennedy assassination was a lone, crazed gunman, told us that this was too. (WSJ news)
留言