Medjugorje was not, and never will be, approved.
Medjugorje fails the Church’s own criteria for authentic Marian apparitions on multiple independent grounds: historical judgments by competent authorities, internal contradictions and falsehoods, doctrinal errors, promotion of disobedience, lack of verifiable supernatural signs, and patterns more consistent with human fabrication, suggestion, or preternatural deception than with heaven.
Local and Higher Church Authorities Have Consistently Withheld Supernatural Recognition
The diocesan bishops of Mostar-Duvno—the ordinary competent authority—rejected the claims from early on. Bishop Pavao Žanić, initially cautious and even protective of the children against communist pressure, concluded after investigation that the events were “the greatest deceit and swindle in the history of the Church,” a fabrication involving fraud, money, and disobedience. He stated explicitly that there were no apparitions of the Madonna and that the devil was involved. His successor, Bishop Ratko Perić, maintained the same negative judgment, documenting lies, contradictions, and absurdities in the seers’ accounts.
The Yugoslav Bishops’ Conference in 1991 issued the formal declaration non constat de supernaturalitate: on the basis of investigations to that point, it could not be affirmed that supernatural apparitions or revelations were occurring. This remains the last clear episcopal conference-level judgment on the supernatural character.
A 2016 internal Vatican consultation of 33 cardinals, bishops, and experts (reported in detail in 2026) produced a decisive majority against: 21 judged the phenomena non-supernatural, only 9 affirmed supernatural origin, and 3 were inconclusive. Six of the negative votes (including three cardinals) went further and attributed a diabolical origin, speaking of a “Satanophany” rather than a Mariophany and calling for strong measures against the seers.
The 2024 Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith note (approved by Pope Francis) grants a nihil obstat for public devotion based on observed spiritual fruits (conversions, sacramental life, prayer). It explicitly does not declare the apparitions or messages supernatural. It repeatedly labels them “alleged,” warns against pilgrimages centered on meeting the visionaries, and notes that the faithful are not obliged to believe any of it. Pope Francis himself had previously expressed skepticism about the ongoing daily visions. This is pastoral tolerance of a popular devotion, not authentication.
Authentic approved apparitions (Lourdes, Fatima, Guadalupe) received clear positive judgments from the local ordinary and higher authority after rigorous examination. Medjugorje has never cleared that bar.
Early Testimony Is Full of Inconsistencies, Bizarre Details, and Broken Predictions.
The original tape-recorded interviews from late June 1981 (conducted by the local Franciscans themselves) reveal a figure that emerges gradually from an indistinct light, wears a gray dress (not the traditional Marian colors), laughs, has shaking hands, allows the children to touch and kiss it (described as “steel to the touch”), and behaves in ways alien to the dignity of every Church-approved apparition. The seers initially claimed the appearances would end after a few more days—yet they have continued for over 40 years, numbering in the tens of thousands.
A “great sign” was repeatedly promised as proof; it never materialized in any verifiable public form, and the seers’ accounts of it shifted and contradicted one another. Bishop Žanić documented multiple instances in which the visionaries were caught in lies—about diaries, about why they were on the hill the first day (initially smoking and hiding, later denied), and about other details. Later narratives were smoothed and sanitized compared with the raw early tapes.
Messages Contain Doctrinal Errors and Encourage Disobedience.
Several messages contradict defined Catholic teaching. Examples include confusion of the divine Persons (“[Jesus] was man and He is God, one and threefold”), denial or distortion of the resurrection of the body (“The body, drawn from the earth, decomposes after death. It never comes back to life again”), and religious indifferentism (“Before God all the faiths are identical”; “In God’s eyes there are no divisions and there are no religions”).
The “Gospa” repeatedly took the side of suspended or disobedient Franciscans against the legitimate bishop, telling the seers the bishop was wrong and that the friars should remain. This is the opposite of the obedience and humility that characterize authentic apparitions. Key Franciscan figures closely tied to the events (Tomislav Vlašić in particular) later faced serious disciplinary action, including laicization, for scandals involving “mystical” justifications for sexual misconduct.
The endless stream of messages is strikingly banal and omits the hard moral issues (abortion, contraception, etc.) that genuine private revelations of the modern era have addressed with clarity and urgency.
Scientific and Psychological Claims Do Not Hold UpPro-Medjugorje medical tests claiming “ecstasy” have been selectively presented. Independent examinations (e.g., 1988) found normal corneal sensitivity and blinking during supposed visions—physiological signs of an ordinary, alert state of consciousness. The overall testing has been criticized as methodologically weak, non-peer-reviewed in proper scientific venues, and fully compatible with suggestion, expectation, or ordinary altered states that non-pathological people can experience. Normal subjects under hypnosis or social pressure routinely report seeing and hearing non-occurring events.
No public, Church-verified miracle comparable to those at Lourdes or Fatima has ever been authenticated as tied to the apparitions themselves.“Good Fruits” Do Not Prove Authenticity
Conversions, confessions, and prayer can and do occur at places of popular devotion even when the underlying claims are false. Scripture itself warns that Satan can appear as an angel of light. Division, scandal among the clergy involved, commercialization, and the creation of a parallel authority structure around the seers constitute clear negative fruits. The local Church has been left in lasting tension precisely because of Medjugorje.In short, Medjugorje has never met the standards the Catholic Church itself applies to distinguish genuine heavenly intervention from human error, fraud, psychological phenomena, or worse. The local ordinaries who knew the facts most intimately rejected it; higher investigations have never reversed that core negative judgment on the supernatural claims; the early record is riddled with problems that authentic apparitions never exhibit; and the messages themselves contain errors no Mother of God would utter. The 2024 pastoral green light for devotion carefully and deliberately leaves the apparitions unapproved. That is not an oversight—it is the Church’s considered restraint.
Catholics are encouraged to participate in only approved events such as Mary's appearance to the Fatima children or Our Lord's appearances to Saint Margaret Mary Alacoque. Medjugorje is false and satanic and anyone who has seriously studied it, runs from it.
Comments